The short answer: The federal government’s position changed significantly in 2025.
For several years, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) treated certain FRTs as machine guns under federal law. That position led to enforcement actions, seizures, litigation, and disputes involving manufacturers and owners.
A major turning point came in July 2024, when the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled in National Association for Gun Rights v. Garland that the Rare Breed FRT-15 and Wide Open Trigger (WOT) at issue could not be classified as machine guns under the federal statute based on the court’s interpretation of the statutory definition. ATF subsequently acknowledged that decision in its public guidance.
The following year brought an even larger change.
On February 7, 2025, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14206, “Protecting Second Amendment Rights.” The order directed the Attorney General to review federal actions affecting Second Amendment rights.
Then, in May 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice announced a settlement resolving federal litigation involving Rare Breed Triggers and related FRT cases. The DOJ stated that the settlement was reached in accordance with President Trump’s executive order and the Attorney General’s Second Amendment Enforcement Task Force.
The DOJ specifically referenced the 2024 Northern District of Texas decision and stated that the court had concluded that FRTs could not be classified as machine guns under the circumstances addressed in that litigation.
What happened to the ATF’s previous FRT policy?
As part of the settlement, the federal government agreed to resolve the pending litigation and, subject to the settlement’s terms, stop treating the covered FRTs as machine guns under the federal government’s previous position.
ATF subsequently announced procedures for returning certain seized Rare Breed FRT-15s and WOTs to eligible owners. ATF’s current guidance also specifically notes that some states independently prohibit FRTs or other trigger-activating devices.
That last point is important.
Federal treatment of FRTs does not automatically mean that every FRT is legal everywhere in the United States. State laws can be different.